Fair loudness-based measures for live events

Explanation, setup, and instructions

Jonathan J Digby

digbyphonic@gmail.com
Digbyphonic Ltd // University of Derby

2025-03-23

Background

It is often required of sound mixers and sound system engineers at live events to operate the sound system within an enforced Sound Level Limit, expressed as an A weighted time-averaged sound level displayed in the FOH mix area.

The typical Lp, Aeq, 15 min limit is an accumulated equivalent sound level of minutes passed; not the present.

Our research paper[1] outlines the application of an existing audio signal metering system to help sound mixers and sound system engineers ensure compliance with sound level limits in the present.

Situation

It is commonplace for each segment of a live concert to be limited to a maximum time-averaged acoustic level, e.g.:

\(98 \text{ dB }\textit{L}_{\textit{p,} \text{Aeq,15}\textit{ min}}\)

Note

The above term specifies an accumulated average — \(\underline{\text{eq}}\)uivalent to a continuous
\(\underline{\text{A}}\)-weighted sound \(_\underline{\mathbf{\textit{p}}}\)ressure \(\underline{L}\)evel of \(\underline{98}\) \(\underline{\text{decibels}}\) over a rolling \(\underline{15}\) \(\underline{\text{minute}}\) period.

Complication

  • A-weighting does not adequately represent human hearing at concert sound levels
  • A-weighting is narrowband, which does not account for broadband variances in typical program content
  • time-averaged measures are determined by past activity; the accumulated contribution of current show levels are not immediately available

Figure A3.1[2(p. 76)]

Figure A3.1 – Discrepancy in low-frequency contribution with A-weighted sound-level measurements.[2(p. 76)]

Solution

  • Concerts and events can use a Target Level loudness to optimize sound exposure within Sound Level Limits through the use of standard Audio Program Loudness Meters[1]

  • The result is real-time broadband loudness normalization, which offers a parallel benefit for stakeholders:
    parity of loudness between acts and show elements, using a fair and psychoacoustically correct measure[35]

  • This is not the case when operating solely to an A weighted and time-averaged Sound Level Limit.

Normalization: Peak vs. Loudness

 

Normalization of a series of programmes

‘It is the average, integrated loudness of the whole programme that is normalised.’[6(p. 7)]

An improved audience experience


The shift from Peak normalization to Loudness normalization provides a consistent and predictable loudness and contrast across all program segments.


This allows an entire event’s audio presentation to function as an optimized and cohesive production, with improved sound quality and impact.

Make Listening Safe

An upper limit of:

100 dB Lp, Aeq,15 min

This is a feature of the World Health Organization’s 2022
Global Standard for Safe Listening Venues & Events.[2(p. 9)]

Note

The fair loudness-based measurement protocol can be calibrated to this limit using Brownian noise for easy integration of the WHO Standard.

Healthy Ears, Limited Annoyance

Becoming an early adopter of the recently introduced Healthy Ears, Limited Annoyance (HELA) Certification is encouraged, as it’s hoped it will become the norm[7].

The HELA initiative is about education, and has the backing of big names in the industry.

Once staff complete the online training the individual and the event is certified, which benefits both.

‘It’s not about turning it down,
but a more comprehensive approach’

Dr Adam J Hill

Strategic use of EBU R 128 loudness metering

  • Calibrated ‘broadcast- and recording-industry standard’ Audio Program Loudness Meters[8] measure the electrical signal output from the mixing consoles:
    e.g. System 1;2;3 and Presenters Desk[1(p. 7)]
  • The acoustic output of the sound system can then be calibrated to whatever Lp, Aeq, T limits are in place:
    FOH, off-site, and so forth[9]
  • The Loudness Meter algorithm is wide-band so acoustic calibration can incorporate C weighting or octave-band limits[1(p. 3),1012]

Practice

Appropriate definitions, descriptions, strategies, and guidance should be taken from the following EBU documents:

  • EBU R 128 – ‘Loudness normalisation and permitted maximum level of audio signals’[8]
  • EBU TECH 3343 – ‘Guidelines for Production of Programmes in Accordance with EBU R 128’[6]
  • EBU R 128 s1 ‘Loudness Parameters for Short-form Content (Adverts; Promos etc.)’ supplement 1 to EBU R 128[15]

Important

It is essential that all FOH operatives, production management and relevant stakeholders are informed about EBU R 128 in advance of the event to allow them time to prepare, discuss, and familiarize[1(p. 7)].

We need to apply an important exception to the R 128 Acoustical Alignment, Listening Level instructions in EBU TECH 3343[6(pp. 22–23)], as follows:

In our situation the Reference Listening Level of the loudspeaker reproduction setup is adjusted to ensure that any A weighted, C weighted, or octave-band Sound Level limits are not breached by a programme with a Maximum Loudness Level of –23,0 LUFS.

This is found by calibrating the sound system’s acoustic gain during propagation tests, and by monitoring the situation throughout.

Instructions

(i) Suggested setup - multi-act event

  • An RME MADI interface with BNC takes Left/Right outputs of all mixing consoles from the Presenters Desk MADI output.

  • The connected PC displays an ITU 1770 / EBU R128 loudness meter for each console using RME’s Digicheck NG[16]

  • The PC’s HDMI output is used to feed its mirrored display to external monitors at each mixing console: e.g.
    System 1;2;3 (stage), and Presenters Desk (PA system)

(ii) Apply changes to default DigiCheck R 128

Use ITU BS.1770-4 Filter

Use ITU BS.1770-4 Filter

 

Intersample Peak (TP): On

Intersample Peak (TP): On

 

Momentary: Peak Hold, Short Term: Slow, EBU 18 dB for System 1–3 EBU 9 dB for Presenters

Momentary: Peak Hold,
Short Term: Slow,
EBU 18 dB for System 1–3
EBU 9 dB for Presenters

(iii) PC external monitor - setup example

Electrical Alignment Signal and Level

  • Ensure filtering and dynamic processing is bypassed on the mixing console output path 
  • Adjust console operating level so that a \(1\) kHz sine wave at
    –20 dBFS on Left output equals –20 dBFS at the Left input of metered devices
  • Repeat for the Right output
  • A coherent 1 kHz sine wave from both Left and Right outputs at –20 dBFS will sum to –20 LUFS

Acoustical Alignment, Listening Level

  • Once sound system optimization is completed, propagation tests should be conducted with appropriate test signals and loudness normalized programme material at a calibrated output level of –23,0 LUFS.
  • All loudspeakers should be operational during propagation tests, with the overall acoustic gain adjusted to fit local conditions.

This procedure differs from R 128 Acoustical Alignment, Listening Level instructions in EBU TECH 3343, pp. 22–23.

(vi) Brownian noise test signals

A recommended type of test signal is broadband Brownian noise, as this has a frequency spectrum that approximates real musical material[1(p. 3),2(p. 87)].

These downloadable two-minute WAV files were prepared with Audacity audio editing software
(right-click, select ‘Save link as’ or similar):

Brownian Noise STEREO -23 LUFS non-coherent L&R 48 kHz.wav
Brownian Noise STEREO -23 LUFS non-coherent L&R 44,1 kHz.wav
Brownian Noise MONO -23 LUFS 48 kHz.wav
Brownian Noise MONO -23 LUFS 44,1 kHz.wav

(vii) Integrated Loudness (I) — Total Time clock

It is the average, integrated loudness of the whole programme that is normalised.[6(p. 7)]

The master R 128 meter (i.e. PA system; Presenters Desk) should ‘start’ at the beginning of show, and ‘stop’ at the end (RME’s Total Time function). This represents the average, integrated loudness of the whole programme.[6(p. 41)]

For individual act consoles (i.e. System 1, System 2, etc.) the meter should ‘stop’ at the end of each act, and ‘start’ at the beginning of a line-check.

(viii) Mixing the show

Sound mixers should refer to their R 128 meter and listen to the result; they need not concern themselves with chasing an SPL target.

Programme that does not exceed the loudness Target Level will likely not exceed the Lp, Aeq, T upper limit, provided the calibration and propagation steps have been completed correctly and circumstances have not changed.

Maximum ‘loudness’

–23,0 LUFS

For live programmes the accepted tolerance is ±1,0 LU at -23,0 LUFS

Tip

The Programme Loudness Level may be normalised to a Target Level lower than –23,0 LUFS on purpose[8(p. 3)].

Short-form content

Summary – Loudness Parameters for Short-form Content (adverts; promos, etc.): 
Programme Loudness –23,0 LUFS
Maximum Short-term Loudness (S) –18,0 LUFS (±5,0 LU on the relative scale)
Maximum True Peak Level –1 dBTP
Loudness Range (not applicable)

Short-form content

“A programme of short duration (typically shorter than 30 seconds but up to approximately 2 minutes). In addition to advertisements (commercials) and promotional items, interstitials, stingers, bumpers and similar very short items also belong to this category.”[15(p. 4)]

Maximum Permitted True-Peak Level

−1 dBTP

Fair loudness-based measurement

The fair loudness-based measurement protocol is ideally suited to any event that wishes to follow safe listening guidelines†:

  • providing consistent and predictable loudness and contrast across all program segments.

  • with noticeable improvements in sound quality, impact, and the audience experience.

Tip

Ensuring that a headline act can play “louder” is straightforward and assured when using the loudness-based approach. See[2(p. 20)].

Conclusion

If there’s to be a competition,
let it be a competition of quality
and not sound pressure level.

It isn’t necessarily the case that higher SPL equates to greater loudness, and vice versa.

The main benefit for stakeholders is parity of loudness across all show elements and acts – using a fairer, psychoacoustically correct measure.

It’ll be useful to calibrate an electrical signal to Lp, Aeq, T , but what may be more beneficial is the improvement in sound quality.

Dr Bruce Wiggins PhD FHEA MAES PGCHE

Work in progress

A number of case studies using our research paper recommendations are planned for the summer of 2025.

The findings will be used to expand specific guidance for implementing our protocol.

Please contact the authors if you are interested in collaborating with us and using your event as a case study.

References

1.
Digby, J. J., & Hill, A. J. (2024). Enhanced Sound Level Monitoring at Live Events by Measuring Audio Program Loudness. Reproduced Sound 2024, 46(4). https://digbyphonic.com/research/rs2024/Digby_and_Hill-2024-Enhanced_Sound_Level_Monitoring_at_Live_Events_by_Measuring_Audio_Program_Loudness.html
2.
World Health Organization. (2022). WHO Global Standard for Safe Listening Venues & Events. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/352277/9789240043114-eng.pdf?sequence=1
3.
Schlittenlacher, J., Hashimoto, T., Kuwano, S., & Namba, S. (2017). Overall judgment of loudness of time-varying sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(4), 1841–1847. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5003797
4.
International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO 532-3:2023 Acoustics — Methods for calculating loudness - Part 3: Moore-Glasberg-Schlittenlacher method (532-3). (Current)
5.
Moore, B. C. J., Jervis, M., Harries, L., & Schlittenlacher, J. (2018). Testing and refining a loudness model for time-varying sounds incorporating binaural inhibition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(3), 1504–1513. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5027246
6.
European Broadcasting Union. (2023). TECH 3343: Guidelines for Production of Programmes in Accordance with EBU R 128. EBU. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/tech/tech3343.pdf
7.
Electro-Acoustics Research Lab (EARLab), University of Derby. (2025, March 3). Healthy Ears, Limited Annoyance: HELA Certification - Championing Safe Listening at Music Events. HELA Initiative. https://helainitiative.com/
8.
European Broadcasting Union. (2023). R 128 — Loudness Normalisation and Permitted Maximum Level of Audio Signals (R 128; Version 5). https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/r/r128.pdf (EBU Recommendation)
9.
British Standards Institution. (2003). BS 7445-1:2003 Description and measurement of environmental noise — Part 1: Guide to quantities and procedures (BS 7445-1:2003). (Under review, Current)
10.
Fiumicelli, D., Parker, V., Lawrence, E., & Stewart, J. (2024). Low Frequency Sound at Outdoor Concerts – a Necessary Noise. 2, 46. https://doi.org/10.25144/23652
11.
The Noise Council. (1995). Code of Practice on Environmental Noise Control at Concerts [Code of Practice]. https://www.gov.je/SiteCollectionDocuments/Leisure%20and%20entertainment/ID%20Code%20of%20Practice%20on%20Environmental%20Noise%2020110517%20RWJ.pdf
12.
Wheeler, P., Sharp, D., & Taherzadeh, S. (2020). An Evaluation of UK and International Guidance for the Control of Noise at Outdoor Events. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 42(3). https://www.ioa.org.uk/system/files/proceedings/17._wheeler._rs2020.pdf
13.
International Telecommunication Union. (2023). Recommendation ITU-R BS.1770-5 (11/2023) Algorithms to measure audio programme loudness and true-peak audio level. https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/bs/R-REC-BS.1770-5-202311-I!!PDF-E.pdf
14.
European Broadcasting Union. (2023). Tech 3341-2023 Loudness Metering: “EBU Mode” Metering to Supplement EBU R 128 Loudness Normalization. EBU. https://tech.ebu.ch/files/live/sites/tech/files/shared/tech/tech3341.pdf
15.
European Broadcasting Union. (2020). R 128 s1: Loudness Parameters for Short-Form Content (Adverts, Promos, etc.) (R 128 s1). EBU. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/r/r128s1.pdf
16.
RME Audio. (2025). DigiCheck NG (Version 0.91) [Windows 10 or up, macOS]. RME Audio. https://rme-audio.de/downloads.html
17.
Mulcahy, J. (2024). REW - Room EQ Wizard Room Acoustics Software (Version 5.31.1) [Win 11/10/8/7/Vista/XP Pro x64; Mac OS 10.15-14; Linux AMD64; Linux]. https://www.roomeqwizard.com
18.
Chalmers, D. (2025). DesktopClock: A digital clock for your desktop! (Version 5.2.0) [Windows]. https://github.com/danielchalmers/DesktopClock?tab=readme-ov-file
19.
Audacity Team. (2025). Audacity ® | Free Audio editor, recorder, music making and more! (Version 3.7.3) [Windows, macOS, Linux]. https://www.audacityteam.org/
20.
Camerer, F. (2010). On the way to Loudness nirvana — audio levelling with EBU R 128. EBU TECHNICAL REVIEW, (Q3). https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/trev_2010-Q3_loudness_Camerer.pdf
21.
Vickers, E. (2010, November 6). The Loudness War: Background, Speculation, and Recommendations. Loudness and Dynamics. 129. https://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=15598