Fair loudness-based measures for live events

Proposal for live event producers and relevant stakeholders

Jonathan J Digby

digbyphonic@gmail.com
Digbyphonic Ltd // University of Derby

2026-10-17

Analogy: a matter of contrast

Imagine, if you will, that you are in a silent space, or in total darkness, or about to take a first bite of food.

There’s a blast of noise, light, or flavour…

Now imagine subsequent identical ‘blasts’, and their effect upon our initial perception.

The impact from a loud blast of noise is dependent upon what has occurred before, during, and what happens after.

That initial impact is not retained, unless care and attention is paid to creating a sensible balance.

A Race to the Limit

Without sensible and comprehensive management of a live show’s overall loudness balance it is easy for the sound level to quickly escalate up to the legally enforced limit or limiting capabilities of the sound system, and to remain pinned there.

But this is often at the expense of sound quality, impact, contrast, and the overall audience experience.

Situation

It is commonplace for Sound Pressure Levels of live events to be measured against a maximum time-averaged metric, e.g.:

\(98 \text{ dB }\textit{L}_{\textit{p,} \text{Aeq,15}\textit{ min}}\)

Note

The above term specifies an accumulated average — \(\underline{\text{eq}}\)uivalent to a continuous
\(\underline{\text{A}}\)-weighted sound \(_\underline{\mathbf{\textit{p}}}\)ressure \(\underline{L}\)evel of \(\underline{98}\) \(\underline{\text{decibels}}\) over a rolling \(\underline{15}\) \(\underline{\text{minute}}\) period.

Loudness \(\neq\) Volume \(\neq\) SPL/Amplitude/Gain

The first is a perceptual quality, the second is a colloquial term loosely related to the others, and the third refers to physical quantities [2–6]. — Tim Ziemer; 2024


The loudness of a sound, especially a complex sound containing many frequencies, has no simple relation to its sound pressure level, and it is hopeless to try to measure relative loudnesses of different sounds by using a sound level meter. — Glenn D White & Gary J Louie; 2005

Complication

  • A-weighting does not adequately represent human hearing at concert sound levels
  • A-weighting is narrowband, which does not account for broadband variances in typical program content
  • time-averaged measures are determined by past activity; therefore, the accumulated contribution of current show levels are not immediately available

Solution

Calibrate the sound system’s acoustic output to a target continuous A-weighted sound level \((\textit{L}_{\textit{p,}\text{AS}})\) at a reference loudness level, using an industry-standard loudness meter [8]:

  • tried and tested real-time indication of sound system loudness levels, designed for ease of use by mix engineers
  • a psychoacoustically correct broadband measure
  • fair comparison of content loudness, which allows a fair apportioning of total sound energy
  • real-time \(\textit{L}_{\textit{p,}\text{Aeq,}\textit{T}}\) limit compliance is ensured 

“Good for Business”

The Fair Loudness approach includes the following positive side effects:

  • improved audience experience
    — good reviews, returning customers

  • a lowering of the noise pollution
    — fewer complaints, greater business sustainability

A Fair Loudness-based Measurement procedure


Published research Paper

[9] Digby JJ, Hill AJ. Enhanced Sound Level Monitoring at Live Events by Measuring Audio Program Loudness. In: Reproduced Sound 2024. Vol. 46. Bristol, GBR: Institute of Acoustics; 2024. https://digbyphonic.com/posts/20241124_IoA_paper/


Institute of Acoustics’ Reproduced Sound 2024 conference.

Peak normalization

The following shows the result of normalizing overall output to a maximum peak level:

The graphic represents a series of programmes (vertical divisions).

Each has been presented up to
its maximum peak signal level:
this is peak normalization.

Loudness is typically inconsistent.

Loudness normalization

Application of a broadcast loudness meter provides a shift from Peak normalization to Loudness normalization.

Here a measured loudness target level is used for each programme:
loudness normalization.

Overall loudness is consistent,
between and within programmes.

‘It is the average, integrated loudness of the whole programme that is normalised.’ [8,p 7]

Loudness parity

Live acts and programme content of different musical styles and instrumentation may not sound equally loud when presented to the same \(\textit{L}_{\textit{p,} \text{Aeq,}\textit{ T}}\) limit.

Loudness parity means equal distribution by fair comparison up to a desired maximum loudness, regardless of content.*

Use of an established and widely-deployed engineering tool provides a fair distribution of loudness between all segments of a live event.

This allows optimum use of any legal sound limit, with the additional benefit of improved sound quality [8].

Opportunity

A change in culture surrounding hearing health is underway.

Your future events are an opportunity to actively encourage an awareness and responsibility within individuals for the hearing of their future selves.

Make Listening Safe*

An upper limit of:

100 dB Lp, Aeq,15 min

This is best considered a ceiling value, it should not be considered a target [10,pp 9, 16]

where an event is expected to attract a majority audience of children, the sound level limit should be reduced at least to 94 dB LAeq,15 min , with 90 dB LAeq,15 min or lower recommended for events targeted at young children.

Peak sound levels at venues or events targeted specifically at children should be limited to not exceed 120 dB LCpeak [11] [10,p 20]

Fair Loudness solution

The fair loudness-based measurement protocol is ideally suited to any event that wishes to follow safe listening guidelines†:

  • providing consistent and predictable loudness and contrast across all program segments.

  • with noticeable improvements in sound quality, impact, and the audience experience.

Tip

Ensuring that a headline act can play “louder” is straightforward and assured when using the loudness-based approach 😉. See [10,p 20]

Conclusion

If there’s to be a competition, let it be a competition of quality and not sound pressure level.

It isn’t necessarily the case that higher SPL equates to greater loudness, and vice versa.

The main benefit for stakeholders is parity of loudness across all show elements and acts – using a fairer, psychoacoustically correct measure.

It’ll be useful to calibrate an electrical signal to Lp, Aeq, T , but what may be more beneficial is the improvement in sound quality.

Dr Bruce Wiggins PhD FHEA MAES PGCHE

Fair loudness measures for live events - SETUP

A self-contained HTML slide deck with technical instructions for implementing the fair loudness-based measurement protocol is available for download at this link:

Improved Management of PA System Leq Limits and Off-Site Annoyance

An HTML slide deck for using the DirectOut PRODIGY sound system processor to manage loudness at live events:

A call for Case Study opportunities

Improved Management of PA System Leq Limits and Off-Site Annoyance
https://digbyphonic.com/posts/20260124_CaseStudy/

Please consider contributing to a case study if you plan on implementing the Loudness Measure procedure at your live event or venue.
The findings may contribute to ‘work in progress’ updates of the following influential documents:

Technical Document AESTD1007.1.20-05 : Understanding and Managing Sound Exposure and Noise Pollution at Outdoor Events, 2020. [12]

WHO Global Standard for Safe Listening Venues & Events, 2022. [10]

References

[1]
Everything Louder than Everyone Else. In: Wikipedia. 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Everything_Louder_than_Everyone_Else
[2]
Schneider A. Perception of Timbre and Sound Color. In: Springer Handbook of Systematic Musicology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2018. p. 687--726. (Springer Handbooks). http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-55004-5
[3]
White GD, Louie GJ. The Audio Dictionary. 3rd ed., rev. and expanded. Seattle: University of Washington Press; 2005.
[4]
Ginsberg JH. Acoustics-A Textbook for Engineers and Physicists: Volume I: Fundamentals. Cham: Springer; 2018. (SpringerLink Bücher). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56844-7
[5]
Acoustical Society of America. ASA/ANSI Standard Acoustical & Bioacoustical Terminology Database. Welcome to ASA Standards. 2023 Nov 5 [accessed 2026 Oct 17]. https://asastandards.org/working-groups-home/working-groups-portal/asa-standard-term-database/
[6]
Gallagher M. The Music Tech Dictionary: A Glossary of Audio-Related Terms and Technologies. Boston, MA: Course Technology; 2009.
[7]
Ziemer T. Sound Terminology in Sonification. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 2024 [accessed 2026 Oct 17];72(5):274–289. https://aes.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=22601. doi:10.17743/jaes.2022.0133
[8]
European Broadcasting Union. TECH 3343: Guidelines for Production of Programmes in Accordance with EBU R 128. 2023 [accessed 2026 Oct 9]. https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/tech/tech3343.pdf
[9]
Digby JJ, Hill AJ. Enhanced Sound Level Monitoring at Live Events by Measuring Audio Program Loudness. In: Reproduced Sound 2024. Vol. 46. Bristol, GBR: Institute of Acoustics; 2024. https://digbyphonic.com/research/rs2024/Digby_and_Hill-2024-Enhanced_Sound_Level_Monitoring_at_Live_Events_by_Measuring_Audio_Program_Loudness.html
[10]
WHO Global Standard for Safe Listening Venues & Events. 2022 [accessed 2026 Oct 17]. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/352277/9789240043114-eng.pdf?sequence=1
[11]
Berglund B, Lindvall T, Schwela DH. New Who Guidelines for Community Noise. Noise & Vibration Worldwide. 2000 [accessed 2026 Oct 17];31(4):24–29. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/0957456001497535. doi:10.1260/0957456001497535
[12]
Hill A, editor. Technical Document AESTD1007.1.20-05 : Understanding and managing sound exposure and noise pollution at outdoor events. 2020 [accessed 2026 Oct 17]. https://aes.org/community/technical-council/aestd1007-understanding-and-managing-sound-exposure-and-noise-pollution-at-outdoor-events/